The New York Times, March 15, 2003
At Conference Tournaments, the Colleges Major in Money
By WILLIAM C. RHODEN
LOS ANGELES
COLLEGE basketball fans have been treated to a slate of
thrilling conference tournament moments: game-winning shots
in the final seconds, overtimes, upsets.
When do the athletes who provide these moments study? Do
they read a few chapters after the game or knock out a
paper or two on the road? Do they cram for exams between
practices? What's your guess?
We used to rationalize: "Oh, it's spring break." But for
half the colleges participating in the Pac-10 tournament,
this is finals week. After Cal disposed of Oregon State
late Thursday night, Ben Braun, the Golden Bears' coach,
conceded that he was uneasy with the tournament.
"My objection to any postseason tournament only stems from
missing class time," he said. Braun is also a good soldier.
"Once you're committed to playing in a tournament, and
that's what your conference does and that's what you're
doing, you have to stay committed to it. But in the future,
the N.C.A.A. might want to look at missed class time and
new formats. It's a tough deal."
Actually, the deal is pretty sweet. The tournament is a
cash register and billboard for a conference eternally
crippled by playing in the wrong time zone - three hours
behind the East Coast bias. Each Pac-10 team could receive
$250,000 for this year's tournament, and Fox Sports Net
pays the conference $4 million a year to televise the
tournament.
Stanford Coach Mike Montgomery does not like the conference
tournament, either. Never has, never will. The three-day
festival takes time away from school. "We're right in the
middle of dead week and finals," he said.
"Call it what it is," Montgomery added. "We want the money,
fine. I just object. Everybody wants to talk about not
taking kids out of class, everybody wants to talk about
academic integrity, but we're not going to hesitate to take
kids out of another week of class."
Last season Stanford was on the road for five of the last
six weeks of the quarter, Wednesday through Saturday each
week. In addition, the Pac-10 plays a regular-season
schedule of 18 games.
"There's nobody else who plays an 18-game conference
schedule and turns around and plays a tournament,"
Montgomery said. "The kids love this. They love it because
they love to compete. But these guys have got some
responsibilities."
Stanford and Oregon have finals next week. If they make the
N.C.A.A. tournament, the basketball teams will have to take
exams on the road, and faculty representatives will proctor
the exams.
Luke Jackson, the Oregon junior who hit the game-winning
3-pointer in the Ducks' 75-74 victory over U.C.L.A. in a
semifinal game last night, said he did not feel academic
pressure and loves the conference tournament. "There's
plenty of time to do your schoolwork," he said. "I've been
going to school every summer since my freshman year, and
I'm in a position to graduate early going into my senior
year." Still, Jackson said that because of the extra games,
more emphasis is placed on playing ball rather than going
to school, especially with coaches who choose not to
emphasize academics.
The Pac-10, the Big Ten and the Ivy League were the
prominent conferences that long resisted the pull of a
postseason tournament. The Big Ten was the first to cave in
to revenue-related pressures. This is the Pac-10's second
attempt at a conference tournament. The conference held a
tournament from 1987 to 1990, then resumed it last year.
The games were not well attended, but for the last several
seasons the Pac-10 has regained its place as one of the
nation's premier conferences. This year Arizona, Stanford,
Cal and Oregon should make the N.C.A.A. tournament;
Southern Cal could sneak in by winning this tournament.
In the grand scheme of college athletics, the demands
imposed by conference tournaments are mostly a nuisance.
The real villain is an insidious, all-consuming pressure to
compete for the entertainment dollar.
Bob Aronson is a professor of law at the University of
Washington and a faculty liaison with the N.C.A.A.'s
Management Council.
"The demands on these student-athletes are enormous,"
Aronson said yesterday. "We need to be looking at ways
people can have more time to study and be in the classroom
more often rather than less."
We moralize about the evils of athletics when a college
accepts a student with a welding certificate or when the
coach's son teaches a course in the principles of
basketball.
But what about a conference holding a tournament in the
middle of exams, or placing suffocating time demands on
student-athletes?
What's your pleasure: exploitation unsanctioned by the
university, or exploitation sanctioned by the universities
in the name of fund-raising? Take your pick, and enjoy the
tournament.
Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
Top
|