The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 6, 2002
How Much Sports Is Too Much?
By JENNIFER JACOBSON
Laura Leonetti likes staying busy.
On a typical Monday afternoon in November, the Brown
University junior attendstwo classes, runs three miles, and
lifts weights for half an hour. In the evening, she watches
Friends and Jeopardy and works on a 15-page paper.
She makes good grades, mostly B's, but her passion is playing
second base on Brown's varsity softball team. Monday is her
team's day off, but she still has her own workout to do. Most
other days she organizes around her softball practices. For
her, the arrangement works.
That's why she is infuriated about the Ivy League's latest
attempt to ensure that its athletes are devoting enough time
to their studies and the other aspects of college life.
The Ivy presidents are requiring teams to take a total of
seven weeks off from practice per year. They are not alone in
worrying about whether athletes are getting the benefits of a
broad college experience. Members of the New England Small
College Athletic Conference have banned "captain's practices"
-- coachless, allegedly voluntary practices led by team
captains during the off-season.
Presidents of Ivy League and Nescac institutions say that by
spending vast amounts of time on the court and the field,
athletes are not taking advantage of opportunities to try new
things on the campus, like taking up a musical instrument, or
getting to know peers who are not athletes. Thus they are not
growing into well-rounded people.
"There was a sense that, in the last 10 years, Division I
rules have permitted athletic activity to be year-round
organized activity," says Jeffrey H. Orleans, executive
director of the Ivy League. "The amount of time athletes have
to focus on other things has been limited." The presidents
"want to give some of that focus back."
As is often the case, the Ivy League members -- and their
like-minded counterparts in the New England conference -- are
adopting more-restrictive rules than the colleges they compete
against. The National Collegiate Athletic Association is
looking at similar issues.
Time Off From Coaches
The new plan calls for Ivy League teams to take seven weeks
off during the course of the academic year. The weeks do not
have to be consecutive but must be in seven-day segments, at
least. During the off weeks, athletes may not participate in
any required practices and may not be supervised by their
coaches. Teams are not allowed to hold captain's practices or
reserve practice time in facilities, but athletes can use the
weight room on their own. The seven weeks also cannot be
scheduled during vacations. In the New England league,
athletes may not gather on their own out of season to hold
practices.
The Ivy League and the small-college conference have always
played by their own rules when it comes to balancing sports
and academics. Both conferences far exceed NCAA rules in
restricting how coaches recruit and how long seasons can last.
But in the past two years, their discussions about the balance
of academics and athletics have taken on a greater sense of
urgency, because of the publication of The Game of Life:
College Sports and Educational Values (Princeton University
Press, 2001), by William G. Bowen and James L. Shulman, the
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation's president and chief financial
officer, respectively. The book argued that colleges often
recruit a disproportionately large number of athletes relative
to their overall student populations, and that athletes tend
to cluster in certain majors, to earn lower grades, and to not
take on leadership roles after they graduate.
So concerned were the New England conference presidents that
they even hired Mr. Bowen, a former Princeton University
president, and Mr. Shulman to study their own institutions
last year. The authors' findings were similar to those of The
Game of Life. Mr. Bowen and Mr. Shulman have done a similar
study of the Ivy League that will be published in a
forthcoming book.
The presidents are trying to halt the trends delineated in The
Game of Life with various measures. Most Nescac colleges have
agreed to cut back on the number of students they admit
primarily on the basis of athletic prowess, and the league's
attempts to dial down the intensity of out-of-season practices
are supposed to cool the athletic experience. Ivy League
institutions also are cutting back on athlete recruiting.
"The lacrosse team may be doing an informal tournament off
campus," says Tom Gerety, president of Amherst College. "And
we all have come to realize that, in that setting, there may
be somebody in the group who says, 'I want to be doing x, y,
and z, but I'd be a bad member of the team if I don't go along
with everyone.'"
The New England league has banned captain's practices since
its founding 30 years ago, but the policy has been largely
ignored on most campuses recently. William D. Adams, president
of Colby College, says the decision to reaffirm the ban was
driven, in part, by a "galvanizing moment" -- an incident in
September, when a Colby ice-hockey player was struck in the
face with a puck at an off-campus practice and required facial
surgery. But the incident, and the liability issues it raised,
was not the main reason for the decision, Mr. Adams says.
Rather, the presidents "really believe in the seasonality of
sports," says Norman Fainstein, president of Connecticut
College and chairman of the conference's executive committee.
"We don't want two cultures on our campus -- an athletics
culture and all the other students in some other world. We
don't believe that's healthy."
Mr. Shulman of the Mellon Foundation applauds both conferences
for sticking to their principles. "The natural inclination of
people who play sports -- to throw themselves into what they
do with great passion -- is a great thing," he says. "It also
should be the charge of those who run academic institutions to
send signals about what they see is the right balance."
Asked why similar limits are not placed on the student
symphony or the campus newspaper, Mr. Gerety says that "these
activities, on the whole, have not presented a large problem
for us." Students in those activities are not "falling behind
in their classes," he says. "We don't feel they pressure one
another to ratchet up the newspaper. It seems to be
self-limiting."
Athlete Discrimination
Many teams at Ivy and Nescac colleges are excellent, even
though they do not offer athletics scholarships. Williams
College has won the Sears Directors' Cup for the most
outstanding athletics program in the NCAA's Division III four
years in a row; Princeton finished 21st in the NCAA Division I
standings for the Sears cup last year; and other teams in both
conferences regularly compete for national titles.
That's why many athletes attend those colleges, and they are
unhappy at the thought of cutting back on their dreams.
Larisa Kindell, a senior and co-captain of Wesleyan
University's swimming team, says the new policy discriminates
against athletes, on the mistaken assumption that "athletics
interferes with academics." In fact, she says, the skills and
traits athletes must have to excel in sports and to balance
their complex lives -- "discipline, time management, and
motivation in general" -- contribute to their academic
success. "If I didn't have swimming, a place to release my
academic stresses, I don't think I'd be as effective in the
classroom or studying at night," she says.
Ms. Kindell, along with her co-captain, had devised a schedule
for weightlifting, running, and swimming for her team's
off-season, and had held a couple of weeks of captain's
practices this fall, before the presidents stopped them. She
says that even though there was no pressure on her teammates
to attend out-of-season captain's practices, which are
voluntary, the players would show up because, "at the college
level, it's obviously something that's important to you, that
you want to get better at."
At Brown, Ms. Leonetti's softball team has already held one
rest period in September, one in October, and a third the week
before Thanksgiving break. Team members will not officially
practice together until February 1. The policy does not ban
informal practices: During the team's seven-day break in
October, she went to the field a couple of times to hit
grounders with some teammates and to work with the catcher on
throwing out runners at second base.
"We athletes wouldn't have chosen to come to an Ivy League
school if we didn't care about our academics," says Ms.
Leonetti, who is organized enough to have prepared a notecard
of talking points for an interview with a reporter. "We've had
to manage our time our whole lives. ... It's like they're
punishing us for trying to be successful at more than just our
studies."
Norma Taylor, the women's tennis coach at Brown, worries that
coaches at colleges that do offer athletics scholarships and
do allow students to practice year-round will now succeed in
recruiting players away from the Ivy League.
David T. Roach, Brown's athletics director, says that part of
the premise behind the seven-week rule -- that athletes lacked
the time for activities besides sports -- was a "somewhat
misguided" assumption. Athletes already do many things besides
sports, he says, citing a Brown baseball player who acted in
two plays last fall and spent six hours a day in rehearsals.
Outside the two leagues, coaches are skeptical about the new
rules. Russell O. Hellickson, head wrestling coach at Ohio
State University, says he doubts that getting more of the
"typical" college experience will necessarily help students
who are serious about their sports. "They don't need to spend
more time on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday going to parties
and getting drunk," he says.
Presidents of both conferences will meet separately this month
to review how the rules have played out on their respective
campuses. Mr. Orleans, the Ivy League official, says he would
be surprised if the presidents changed any aspect of the
seven-week rest period.
Andrea Savage, Nescac's director, says its presidents will
"hopefully reach common guidelines" on applying the
captain's-practice ban and on what is permissible
out-of-season athletic activity. Douglas J. Bennet Jr.,
Wesleyan's president, says he thinks the ban will stick
indefinitely. "I see no reason to change" it, he says.
The two conferences' restrictions foreshadow a larger debate
in the NCAA about whether athletics are preventing students
from becoming well-rounded people. Presidents of large
institutions have been discussing whether to toughen
restrictions on voluntary off-season workouts, which often are
not voluntary for athletes who want to stay on a team. During
the past two years, three football players have died in
off-season workouts, and "student-athlete welfare" is now a
major topic of conversation in NCAA circles.
The problem is simple: Athletes want to practice their sport
as much as possible. But nobody has quantified how much is too
much.
Although they are best known for their academic prowess, most
members of the Ivy League and the New England Small College
Athletic Conference have very strong sports programs, too.
Here's how each institution finished last year in the Sears
Directors' Cup rankings for Division I (for the Ivy
institutions) and Division III (for Nescac colleges). Colleges
are ranked based on how their teams finished in national and
conference championships.
_________________________________________________________________
Copyright 2002 by The Chronicle of Higher Education
Top
|