The Chronicle of Higher Education
October 13, 2000
Duke U. Discriminated Against Female Football Player, Jury
Finds
By WELCH SUGGS
A federal jury found Thursday that Duke University illegally
discriminated against a female kicker by cutting her from its
football team because she was a woman, and the jurors made
Duke pay in a big way: with a $2-million damage award.
An all-state placekicker in high school, Heather Sue Mercer
tried to join the football team when she arrived at Duke, and
even kicked a game-winning field goal in a 1995 intrasquad
scrimmage. But the team's coach, Fred Goldsmith, refused to
let her even sit on the sidelines the following fall and
dismissed her from the team before spring practice began in
1996.
Duke's lawyers argued that she simply wasn't as good as the
other kickers on the team, and the university's president,
Nannerl O. Keohane, testified that Ms. Mercer was given extra
chances to make the team. But Ms. Mercer's lawyers argued that
she had been treated differently from other kickers who tried
out for the team, violating Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972, which forbids gender discrimination at
institutions that receive federal funds.
Mr. Goldsmith and several former coaches and kickers testified
that Ms. Mercer did not have the strength to boot long field
goals against major-college competition, but the coach said he
admired her effort.
"It was obvious she was trying to do something special," Mr.
Goldsmith testified. "It was different, so I admired her for
that. I admired her for her spunk. I probably would have been
a lot more brutal with a male. I would have said, 'Sorry, son,
you just don't have it.'"
But Ms. Mercer said he told her to forget about "boys' games"
and that she ought to try out for a local beauty pageant.
Ms. Mercer sued Duke in 1997 under Title IX, but Duke pointed
out in court papers that the law's guidelines state that women
do not have the right to participate on coeducational teams in
contact sports, such as football. Last year, however, a
three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit, in Richmond, ruled in the Duke case that under Title
IX, universities can choose whether to allow women to try out
for contact sports. If a university does permit women to try
out, the appeals court said, it must not discriminate against
female players once they're on the team.
Duke officials released a one-line statement saying that they
were disappointed by the ruling and expected it to be
overturned on appeal. Ms. Mercer's lawyers were in transit
last night and could not be reached for comment.
Copyright 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education
Top |